Friday, January 4, 2013

The Comming Disruption of Big Data

The predictions have been coming for some time that Big Data will make a tremendous impact in our Digital Universe.  I made a presentation back in 2008 to an FFRDC that suggested to them that this was an area they should start looking into for their government clients, but it didn't get much traction then (may it was just me?).

Steve Todd recently posted that a recent issue of The Economist indicated that three technology trends are enabling machines to become more prevalent:
  • The new version of the internet protocol (IPV6), with an address space of 128 bits, provides for 340 billion, billion, billion, billion unique addresses.  The current protocol, 32 bits long, supported only 4.3 billion binary addresses.
  • There has never been enough bandwidth to support wireless M2M data streams.  Over the past year, new 4G networks have rolled out to accommodate smart phones and pads.
  • Cloud computing has collapsed the unit cost of storage.
The interaction of these trends are what disruption is all about. These trends, along with the growth in analytic visualization, will allow any organization to mine the data that collected an an accelerating rate and quickly respond to nascent indicators of interest.  New product and services will meet the immediate needs of crowd-sourced requirements.

Thursday, January 3, 2013

Security In Your Digital Life

Let's talk about a different kind of disruption today - how your digital and personal life is disrupted by those who might attack you in some way, whether physically or digitally.  We recently had some friends who live in a retirement setting in a gated retirement community.  This facility has the type of security you would want people to have who might be less able to protect themselves.  But, they were robbed.  If you have ever been robbed you know how invasive and disruptive that can be.  But, they were robbed not just once, but twice.  Treasures acquired over a life time were taken.

The second robbery took all of their important papers that contained their wills, etc.  The potential for ID theft is now very real to them.

Physical protection is relatively easy - locks, alarms, protective services - but none are foolproof.  To protect my property I only have to worry about access to that property, which is usually located in one place, maybe a few places.  But digital protection is much harder.  Much of my identity information is scattered around the country depending on someone else to protect that information.  I have no control over how, or if, they do anything to protect that information.  I can implement digital protection on my computers and servers, but even that depends on the manufactures of those devices and software to have a system that works and is kept up to date against the rapidly changing methods used by those who would digitally attack you.

Information Assurance (IA) is a hot topic these days.  Standards have been developed by NIST and others.  But, these are only lacklusterly followed by many, leaving them easy targets.  But, like physical security, digital security is not foolproof.  If you want to be absolutely secure, then you have get rid of anything that someone wants to take from you.  Digitally, that mean unplugging your computers from the grid.

Monday, December 31, 2012

Most Disruptive Technologies of 2012

So, on this last day of 2012, what technologies are people saying were the most disruptive?  Christopher Mims put together a list of 5 that seems to be the most reblogged and quoted list around, but there are a few others that are proposed.

The list proposed by Mims includes the following:

  1. Controlling computers without touching them.
  2. Fusing the virtual and the real;
  3. The world’s most cost-effective energy storage;
  4. The end of cars as we know them;
  5. 5 billion people with internet access.
A good discussion of each of these can be found here.  If you want to know more about Christopher Mims you can find a short bio here.


The MIT Technology Review has put together a different take on disruption by publishing a list of 50 Disruptive Companies.  They define a disruptive company as "a business whose innovations force other businesses to alter their strategic course."  Their choice of companies is based on the following: "As a group, the companies on this list represent our best judgment of the commercial innovations most likely to change lives around the world."

Do you agree with these reports?  What technologies do you think should have been included as disruptive for 2012?  What companies should be included in the MIT Technology Review list that are not there?